No Lose Correct Score Betting (Slicer Method)
#16
Posted 20 February 2010 - 05:57 PM
#17
Posted 20 February 2010 - 06:08 PM
Using one scenario, I would have a profit of £13 at half-time if its not 0-0. If it 0-0, my potential loss would be £56 but I wold have potential profit of £160 (approx) through backing 0-0 with £20. I could then lay 0-0 with more than £20 to guarantee a profit as the odds should have dropped by then.
Seems to work ! So if this isn't the system, will need to think about it again (But I like this anyway and might experiment with it and post it if it works consistently)
I will just ask you yes or no like my colleague Kevin
Is Bet 1 lay 0-0 H/ T (Yes)
Is Bet 2 back 0-0 full-time
Is bet 3 lay 0-0?
(I think you are saying 'no' to at least bet 3?
IT, you are not I'm afraid.
Good luck and thankyou for trying this.
If you get it, I will confirm for you and you will be rewarded for your investment in time, many times over.
#18
Posted 20 February 2010 - 06:41 PM
#19
Posted 20 February 2010 - 06:53 PM
I will have a think about this and see if I can crack it!
If you feel like giving any more clues than that would be great!
#20
Posted 20 February 2010 - 07:16 PM
Bet 1 = Lay 0-0 Half-time
Bet 2 = Back 0-0 full time
Clearly, the lay in Bet 1 must be > than the back of 0-0 in case there is a goal before half-time
So if there's a goal, no problem, you have a profit.
If its 0-0 at half time, you have a loss on the lay, BUT you still have a "Potential" profit if it finishes 0-0.
You therefore need to find a bet which also covers a goal in the second half. so that the profit on a goal in the second half makes up for 2 losses: the loss on the lay H/T and the loss on the back 0-0.
OK, I am fairly sure that the above must be correct?
So the red you must be referring to is what happens if there is a goal and the green must be similarly the green that must outwieght this red.
But didn't you say Bet 3 is also a single bet on the correct score market - is that right? (Yes /No?)
And this would have to be made at half-time? (Yes / No?)
Thanks - I can see now what you mean, as the amount you lay at ht on 0-0 would be a prob if it was 0-0 due to the original loss on that market.
I will have a think about this and see if I can crack it!
If you feel like giving any more clues than that would be great!
#21
Posted 20 February 2010 - 07:28 PM
#22
Posted 21 February 2010 - 02:57 PM
#23
Posted 21 February 2010 - 06:22 PM
This is not something you can expect to solve in an afternoon!
A lot of time and effort invested now could see your betting life transformed.
Is the critical factor the relationship between the odds to lay 0-0 at HT and the odds to back 0-0 at FT?
For instance do the FT odds have to be 4x or more the HT odds?
What percentage of in-play games would you be able to use the system on?
#24
Posted 21 February 2010 - 06:33 PM
#25
Posted 21 February 2010 - 06:44 PM
What about laying off the back of 0-0 at half time to cover losses on 0-0 1-0 and 0-1 and then backing Over 1.5 at HT? Not sure the odds would work but it might be worth a look.
The deeper you look the more complicated it gets, was trying it out on the City v Liverpool game but could not get the 8% profit which is the aim if it is 0-0 at HT.
Not sure about your suggestion, will have to look out for a game to try it on. Have not got into actual score lines yet, looking more on the over/under theory at moment.
#26
Posted 21 February 2010 - 08:33 PM
#27
Posted 21 February 2010 - 08:35 PM
#28
Posted 21 February 2010 - 08:36 PM
#29
Posted 21 February 2010 - 10:14 PM
In answer,
Not always (you're still looking for outcomes)
Depends on what the actual odds are
It's hard to say but I played
Aston Villa Vs Burnley today
And I'm playing Real Madrid Vs Villareal now.
Which obviously both won with just bet 1 which wins me £36 per time less commission.
I am making this too easy!
That is what I was getting at. You play on games that have odds that are lopsided rather than a closely matched game, so you would play on Villa v Burnley but not City v Liverpool.
#30
Posted 21 February 2010 - 10:19 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users