football trading


Choose A Review In The Dropdown Box, And Hit Read Live Review!

0

ZH Subscribe – Final Review

ZH Subscribe

26th January 2012

Passed: 

Inspector DJ – Reviews ZH Subscribe

Hello Bloggers,

ZH Subscribe is a subscription based lay tipping service for football.

The team at ZH Subscribe offer a fourteen day free trial, then a payment choice of £15 per month, or £150 per year.

Their website clearly states that no refunds will be made, and recommends that new subscribers take a monthly deal initially, to make sure that they are happy with the service, before extending their subscription, should they so wish.

They currently concentrate on seven major leagues across the globe:

England’s Premier League and Championship
Italy’s Serie A
Spain’s La Liga
Norway’s Tippaligaen
Major League Soccer from the States
and Brazil’s Campeonato

During the course of the test, one French Ligue 1 game was advised, but none from Serie A and Major League Soccer.

When I started the review, according to the results shown on the website, there had been ten selections for August and September, with an expectation of eight to sixteen selections a month, which looked ideal for those that do not wish to be overloaded with bets.

This review covered a twelve week period, as there was not bets every day.

Zero Hype Subscribe also offer the opportunity to receive selections via SMS to advise when a selection has been issued, and appears from the instruction video to take a couple of minutes to set up.

Each selection will advise a liability to be risked on each selection, together with advice as to when the bet should be traded, hopefully when the plan goes in the right direction.

The review started with two banks of £500, one to trade with, the other to have straight lay bets from.

The results were as follows:

Trading Bank:
Start balance: £500.00.
Total profit: £77.34.
Final balance: £577.34

Matches traded: 20
Wins: 19
Loss: 1
Strike Rate: 95.0%

Betting Bank:
Start balance: £500.00.
Total profit: £64.79.
Final balance: £564.79

Matches layed: 20
Wins: 18
Loss: 2
Strike Rate: 90.0%

Combined:
Start balance: £1000.00
Total profit: £142.13
Final balance: £1142.13

Total liabilities: £1039.98
Return on liability: 13.7%

Profitability
A return from the service of well in excess of 10% is good, it must be borne in mind that you have to pay the subscription fees from this, and with the £1000 bank we used here, that would have reduced the profit to just under £100, and a return on liability of just under 10%.

Of course, with a larger bank still, the profits would be greater.

Rating 4.0.

Ease of use
Very straightforward. The emails arrive in plenty of time to allow bets to be placed, and on most occasions, the odds advised to lay at were either available immediately, or matched before kick off. The one time that really sticks in my mind was the French Ligue 1 game, but even then, that was picked up in the first five minutes of the game.

With trading, you need to be at or around your computer to operate the service, but there are websites that will alert you to a goal having been scored.

Rating 3.5.

Risk
In my opinion, the guys behind ZH Subscribe do as much as possible, in terms of checking stats and team news before issuing a selection. On more than one occasion, all the boxes had not been ticked from their point of view, and a selection was not then advised.

Trading does carry risks of course, and it is always advisable not to just have one option to be able to exit the trade if that is method of operating the selections provided.

Each email contained full advice as to what the odds to be used were and when to trade out. During the course of the game, tweets and further emails sent, just in case further advise or confirmation was needed.

Rating 4.0.

Time Required.
Potentially up to two hours per selection as a maximum. The emails arrive in plenty of time, and as I said during the course of the review, the guys behind ZH subscribe send emails on a regular basis to keep their members informed as to their thoughts as to when a selection may be offered.

Overall rating 4.0.

The only thing I could be disappointed with this service was that there were not more trades. 18 of the 20 selections were sent on a Saturday or Sunday. I cannot say why this is the case, it could be down to any number of reasons, perhaps liquidity at the weekend is better, there are certainly more matches, and perhaps, the quality of information relating to injuries and team news in general is easier to find.

This service makes a profit. As a member, you can make the choice between straight lay bets or trading, and during the course of the review, there was one more loss on the straight lays over the trades. At the end of the review, there was a small difference between the two.

Overall, the review of the ZH Subscribe service was successful, and appears from the limited number of selections seen, to be a steady builder of a bank.

Until the next time,

Inspector DJ


[Click here to see Zero Hype Subscribe]

Inspector DJ-Reviews ZH Subscribe

Written by on . Comment#

Passed with 5/5 Stars!

Passed with 4.5/5 stars!

0

Betting Pro Trades – Final Review

31st January 2012

Betting Pro Trades


Inspector DJ – Reviews Betting Pro Trades

Hello Bloggers,

Betting Pro Trades is a subscription based trading service. Looking at the previous results on their website, the majority of the selections are for football, with the occasional selection for other sports.

The website proclaims:

Here at Betting Pro Trades, we provide users with the exact same trades as we do on a daily basis. We aim to provide some of the best betting / trading information available daily and anyone from an experienced trader to a total newbie can use our service.

The cost of the service is shown on the front page of the website at £17.49 per month, plus in the UK, an additional cost of VAT at £3.50. Of course, VAT (or sales tax) varies from country to country, so please double check the information applicable to your part of the world.

If you would like a two-week free trial of the service, contact can be made with Betting Pro Trades by email, without any payment details. There is also a 60-day moneyback guarantee with Clickbank.

Each selection will advise the stake to be placed, when to trade out, and should things not go the way expected, what stop loss is to be placed.

The review started with a £1,000 bank, which was increased to £2,000, after we added the additional amount in the second week of December, as the Betting Pros website shows an “example” bank of £2,000, which also allowed the review to continue.

Profitability
The final results of this review were:

Selections: 142 (11 voided or scratched)
Wins: 89
Strike Rate: 62.7%

Starting Bank: £2,000.00
Loss: £1,190.20
Final balance: £809.80.

The bank lost almost 60% of its value during the course of this review.

I did keep an approximate calculation of the trades at level stakes, and with stakes of £10 per trade, the loss would have been around £93, which would still have been a loss, but perhaps a little easier to recover from and to accept.

Ease of use
The selections were provided in good time for the bets to be placed, usually early in the morning, and on a handful of occasions, the night before.

However, when trading on football, matches take place at various times of the day, especially at the weekend, and potentially you could be trading the selections from early in the morning (the earliest kick off was 11:30), to very late in the evening (the latest kick off was a Brazil match which kicked off at 10:30pm).

Risk
This is where I feel the review failed. A number of traders will risk say 5% of their bank on a trade, which would have meant a liability here of £100. On a number of occasions during the review, the initial risk was far more than this, especially laying the draw, and although a stop loss was normally deployed, this was not always the case.

Conclusion
The overwhelming fact of this review is that nearly 60% of the bank was lost, which would take some time to recover from. Both in the mindset as well as the bank balance.

Regrettably, the Betting Pros service will have to be consigned to the failed category.

Until the next time,

Inspector DJ

[Click here to see Betting Pro Trades]

Inspector DJ-Reviews Betting Pro Trades

Written by on . Comment#

Passed with 5/5 Stars!

Passed with 4.5/5 stars!

0

Hello Bloggers,

There were two trades sent by Betting Pro Trades today.

Confederation of African Nations Cup
Sudan vs Angola

Advice: Lay Sudan in the Draw No Bet market.
Lay odds advised: 3.00, stake £100.00
Back odds advised: 6.00, stake £50.00.
Lay odds taken: 1.45.

When I first opened this market today, the odds on offer were 2.90/3.05. As usual, placed an order at 3.00 as advised, and waited for kick off.

By kick off, the market looked as if it was going to be liquid, but at this point, there was only some £12,000 matched.

Angola scored after only five minutes, and after waiting for the market to settle, which seemed to take a great deal of time, odds of 15.00 were on offer, which I took with both hands, which at that point had just over £12,500 matched.

At this point we had a winning trade in hand. However, the match ended as a 2-2 draw, and as this was a Draw No Bet market, all bets were voided.

Italy – Coppa Italia
A C Milan vs Lazio

Advice: Lay A C Milan to qualify.
Lay odds advised: 1.50, stake £200.00
Back odds advised: 3.00, stake £100.00.
Lay odds taken: 1.45.

When I looked at this market for the first time this morning, the odds on offer in another illiquid looking market (around £500), was £1.46/1.50. However, the amount available was £45, so took this and left the remainder to see what happened in the lead up to kick off.

By kick off, the odds had reduced quite substantially, to 1.40/1.41, especially in the period leading up to the game starting. Of course, during that time, our bet had been taken up.

Cup games often turn up surprises, and Lazio took the lead after only five minutes, at which point, the odds were briefly above 2.00, only for Milan to score twice in three minutes (15 and 18 minutes).

The second half was very quiet on the goals front, with Milan scoring a third after 84 minutes, and running out what seems on the face of things to be comfortable winners, but a losing trade for the review.

Loss to bank: £100.00.

Liabilities for today: £100.00.
Total liabilities to date: £20186.60.

Loss for the day: £100.00.
Current Bank: £809.80 (starting bank £2000.00)

Selections: 142 (11 voided or scratched)
Wins: 89
Strike Rate: 62.7%.

This review has been published for 56 betting days now, and although it has recovered a little from its position from just before Christmas, it is still substantially below its starting point.

The daily postings of trades will stop at this point, and I will be returning in the next few days with my final thoughts with regard to this service.

Until the next time,

Inspector DJ

[Click here to see Betting Pro Trades]

Written by on . Comment#

Passed with 5/5 Stars!

Passed with 4.5/5 stars!