Expected Winners – Final Review Summary
30th August 2011
Inspector John Reviews Expected Winners
Hello Bloggers,
Admin Gordon here.
As you will be aware, our reviewer Inspector John, ran into some problems with our review of Expected Winners, when he had the audacity to question some of the results being claimed by Adrian Davies, mainly associated with his Greyhound selections.
He met with a very dismissive response, amid various claims of wealth, achieved one assumes either from his betting success, or from managing to get plenty of people to pay for his information, you decide.
Subsequently, and in an attempt to bring you a review we were actually quite excited about initially, I attempted to contact Adrian Davies myself. I apologised for any problems we may have caused him, ate a large portion of humble pie, and asked if we could restart the review of his service for our readers. I even suggested that we could focus purely on his main selections, the one people actually pay for, and ignore the “free” selections completely. I must confess I have always struggled to understand how any selections can be free, when to receive them you have to pay approx £100 per month subscription fees?
Several weeks have passed, and my email has been met with stoney silence on the part of Adrian Davies, so we have no alternative now, other than to give up and bring the review to a halt.
I must also confess to having had some previous experience of Adrian Davies and his service, as I reviewed and monitored it several years ago. Then, as now, things ended in tears! Once again the main problem was the Greyhound selections, with on many occasions Lay selections being put up at non BAGS meeting, so it was not even possible to get a bet on!! This never stopped Adrian Davies including them in his results as successful lay bets!!
So in conclusion, we have no option, other than to fail the Expected Winners service, not least because of Adrian Davies’s attitude when questioned about his results.
I aplogise to Inspector John for hijacking his review, but felt it was my duty, under the circumstances, to wrap this one up.
Regards
Gordon
[Click here to see Expected Winners.....]
Inspector John Reviews Expected Winners
Written by on Aug 30th, 2011. Comment. 
Passed with 5/5 Stars!
- All
By The Book Rating:
Passed with 4.5/5 stars!
- Betfair ATM Rating:
- Bonus Bagging Rating:
- Golden Key Method 2 Rating:
- Layers Of Profit Rating:
- The BetPlan Rating:
Written by on Jul 24th, 2011. 3 Comments.
Passed with 5/5 Stars!
- All
By The Book Rating:
Passed with 4.5/5 stars!
- Betfair ATM Rating:
- Bonus Bagging Rating:
- Golden Key Method 2 Rating:
- Layers Of Profit Rating:
- The BetPlan Rating:
22 July 2011
I did have a reply today from Adrian C.Davis, the author of Expected Winners, who gave me a ‘right old’ flea in my ear and explained how he makes “thousands a day from backing his own selections,” lives in a “£400K house,” has “top of the range cars and owes nothing.” He also explained that he spends “12 hours a day to help genuine punters and does not need people who spend all day nit-picking and trying to find fault with what I do.” Well that’s me buggered then!
In his scathing missive he did say that he checked the Greyhound lay prices with the bookmakers and the Racing Post (the same thing really), which goes to show that there have been a large amount of his published results that are completely inaccurate. I did explain to him that I have no problem with rest of his bets, we always closely agree with each other, but I also consider it my duty as a reviewer to present the facts with the punter in mind, as if it is myself who is putting (or trying to put) the bets on and what prices are available within the author’s own parameters.
I do not think he realises the implications of claiming something happened when it did not. It does not matter that this section of his bets are “free,” they are part and parcel of his service and results should be reported with honesty, not guesswork.
Today the service made an 11.48 points loss with only the Main Selection lays coming out with any credit with a 3.8 points profit. The Greyhounds made an appalling loss of 9.1 points, although nine of the 12 lays were too high in price and of the three remaining two went and won instead of losing.
This puts the service back into the red by nearly three points.
Bank Status at Day 26
Main Investments (4 x 100-point banks)
Back Bets Lay Bets Each-way Bets Naps
56.27 96.73 76.63 97.27
Greyhound Selections (2 x 100-point banks)
Back Bets Lay Bets
80.77 175.85
Additional Bets (100-point bank)
Awesome Method
113.59
| MAIN INVESTMENT SELECTIONS | ||||||||
| BACK1 THIRSK 1.30 WHITE FROST | WON | 10/11 | +0.91 | |||||
| BACK2 ASCOT 2.45 MEHDI | Lost | -1 | ||||||
| BACK3 THIRSK 3.10 SELF CENTRED | Lost | -1 | ||||||
| BACK4 SOUTHWELL 5.15 HI TIDE | Lost | -1 | ||||||
| BACK5 THIRSK 5.30 ROYAL BLADE | Lost | -1 | ||||||
| BACK6 CHEPSTOW 6.50 DELAWARE DANCER | Lost | -1 | -4.09 | |||||
| E/W YORK 8.30 RESTLESS BAY | Lost | -2 | -2 | |||||
| NAP SOUTHWELL 4.05 PIPER’S SONG | WON | 10/11 | +0.91 | +0.91 | ||||
| SEC LAY SOUTHWELL 2.20 GINGER’S LAD | WON | +0.95 | ||||||
| SEC LAY ASCOT 4.30 POINT NORTH | WON | +0.95 | ||||||
| SEC LAY CHEPSTOW 7.20 BIRDOLINI | WON | +0.95 | ||||||
| SEC LAY YORK 8.30 IRISH BOY | WON | +0.95 | +3.8 | |||||
| Sub total | -1.38 | |||||||
| AWESOME Method: Note suggested bet strength at 1 point (0.5 pts each-way) | ||||||||
| YORK 6.00 YOJIMBO EACH WAY | Lost | -1 | ||||||
| NEWMARKET 6.10 SANDBETWEENYOURTOES | N/R | 0 | -1 | |||||
| Sub total | -1 | |||||||
| GREYHOUND SELECTIONS | ||||||||
| Maximum liability 6/1 or 7.0 with the exchanges | ||||||||
| NOTTINGHAM | Betfair | |||||||
| LAY 1 6.28 RAGTIME HAWK TP 1 | too high | 13.0 | 0 | |||||
| LAY 2 6.48 SALACRES BUTLER TP 5 | too high | 11.0 | 0 | |||||
| LAY 3 7.06 COME ON CLARKY TP 1 | too high | 12.0 | 0 | |||||
| LAY 4 7.22 PINEAPPLE JAMIE TP 4 | Lost | 3.25 | -2.25 | |||||
| LAY 5 7.37 JETHART JUDY TP 3 | too high | 7.8 | 0 | |||||
| LAY 6 7.52 DUNHAM MOJITO TP 4 | too high | 11.5 | 0 | |||||
| BACK 1 7.06 ROMEO HECTOR TP 6 | Lost | 3.25 | -1 | |||||
| BACK 2 7.52 TINAS COCO TP 3 | Lost | 3.8 | -1 | |||||
| SHEFFIELD | ||||||||
| LAY 1 6.38 WHISTLER BOUND TP 4 | too high | 13.0 | 0 | |||||
| LAY 2 6.56 HURTLOCKER TP 1 | Lost | 4.8 | -3.8 | |||||
| LAY 3 7.11 LILY WHITE STAR TP 3 | too high | 8.0 | 0 | |||||
| LAY 4 7.26 JUSTICE FOR MATT TP 6 | too high | 20.0 | 0 | |||||
| LAY 5 7.42 PETITE CLEO TP 3 | WON | 5.7 | +0.95 | |||||
| LAY 6 7.58 RUNAROUND JIMMY TP 3 | too high | 14.0 | 0 | |||||
| BACK 1 7.11 LOGANDYKE LIZZIE TP 4 | Lost | 2.56 | -1 | |||||
| BACK 2 7.58 BOLD MARIE TP 5 | Lost | 3.25 | -1 | |||||
| Sub total (after commision) | -9.1 | |||||||
| Day’s Total | -11.48 | |||||||
| OVERALL PROFIT/LOSS | -2.89 | |||||||
Best Regards
Inspector John
Written by on Jul 22nd, 2011. Comment.
Passed with 5/5 Stars!
- All
By The Book Rating:
Passed with 4.5/5 stars!
- Betfair ATM Rating:
- Bonus Bagging Rating:
- Golden Key Method 2 Rating:
- Layers Of Profit Rating:
- The BetPlan Rating:
Latest Discussion